Why should
Malaysia opt the the sixth fuel-NUCLEAR??That question has been the focus of
heated political debate in Malaysia for the past eight years. Mahathir Mohamad,
who served as prime minister from 1981 to 2003, was firmly committed to a
non-nuclear Malaysia. But since his departure, his successors have made some
moves toward nuclear energy production. In December 2010, for example, Peter
Chin, the country's energy minister, announced plans to build two
1,000-megawatt nuclear power plants by 2022. A month later, Prime Minister
Najib Razak announced the establishment of the Malaysian Nuclear Power
Corporation, which will lead the planning process.
The Fukushima nuclear accident, however, has raised new doubts
about whether Malaysia is ready for nuclear power. Malaysian experts disagree
over the need for nuclear power plants, and their potential impact on public
safety and the environment. There is little doubt that Malaysia must develop
new energy sources to meet its future energy demands without relying on costly
foreign imports. But these demands can be met with renewable energy instead.
In any debate over Malaysian energy
policies, three important documents are always used as points of reference. The
first was Malaysia's 1979 National Energy Policy, the objective of which was to
ensure an adequate, secure, and cost-effective supply of energy -- as well as
to promote energy efficiency while discouraging wasteful and unproductive
patterns of energy consumption. The second key document was the 1981 four-fuel
diversification policy, which was formulated to reduce over-dependence on a
single fuel source by developing four types of energy: hydropower, oil, natural
gas, and coal. Finally, the third reference point was the five-fuel
diversification policy introduced in 2000, which included renewable energy
(except hydropower) as a fifth energy source.
These three policies have worked well to fulfill the energy
demands of the country, and have received widespread support. But now that
nuclear power is being considered as Malaysia's sixth fuel, there is no longer
general agreement on energy policy. Three main groups have emerged: one that
strongly favors the development of nuclear energy, another that supports
nuclear energy but is concerned about safety and environmental effects, and a
third group that rejects any moves toward nuclear power in Malaysia.
WE
NEED NUCLEAR. Proponents of nuclear power point to the
current energy situation in Malaysia as evidence that new energy sources must
be developed. Government officials believe that Malaysia's current energy
sources will not be sustainable beyond 2020, and that the depletion of the
nation's fossil-fuel resources is a threat to national security.
Analysts predict that escalating global oil prices will force
Malaysia to become a net oil importer in the years to come. Malaysia uses oil
mainly in the transportation sector, and relies on natural gas and coal (along
with hydropower) to generate electricity. However, government officials have
expressed concern that the cost of coal and gas is likely to soar in the coming
decades, as supply fails to keep up with demand. Malaysia's coal imports, which
held steady for many years, have grown rapidly in the past two years. Natural
gas is currently the largest energy source for the country, but national gas
fields may be depleted by 2027, which would leave the country unable to meet
petrochemical industry demand and commitments for exports of liquefied natural
gas.
Because of these gathering storms, there is no doubt that Malaysia
urgently needs new sources of energy to assuage its future energy demands, and
nuclear energy seems a very attractive alternative -- particularly since the
neighboring countries of Vietnam and Thailand have already announced plans to
bring their first nuclear plants online by 2020, and Indonesia intends to
construct a plant on Java Island by 2015. Nevertheless, for Malaysia, the
prudent management of current energy resources -- to ensure that they are
sustainable over the long term -- deserves serious consideration as an
alternative to nuclear energy.
No comments:
Post a Comment